Crazy Contraptions

(add)
(Key moments: this happened, and they didn't)
(6 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
== Broadcast ==
== Broadcast ==
-
Optomen for Channel 4, 29 April 2022 to present
+
Optomen for Channel 4, 29 April to 5 June 2022 (7 episodes in 1 series)
</div>
</div>
Line 22: Line 22:
<div class="image">[[File:Crazy contraptions kitchen machine.jpg|400px]]''Part of a machine built by team "Social Mediocrity" to flip a switch on the kettle at the right of the screen.''</div>
<div class="image">[[File:Crazy contraptions kitchen machine.jpg|400px]]''Part of a machine built by team "Social Mediocrity" to flip a switch on the kettle at the right of the screen.''</div>
-
Unfortunately, with so many moving parts (and on this occasion that's not a metaphor), there's very little time to focus on the various engineering challenges in any depth, and then the finale is critically undermined by choppy editing. To show off a chain reaction machine properly, the camerawork needs to be as well choreographed as the machine itself, capturing the whole thing in a single flowing shot if at all possible. 48 edits in 70 seconds really won't cut it - or rather it ''will'' cut it, to ribbons, robbing us and the teams of the big "wow" moment at the end. All a bit of a shame, because this could have been a fun twist on the build-a-machine genre, if only the contestants' ingenuity had been matched on the production side.
+
Unfortunately, with so many moving parts (and on this occasion that's not a metaphor), there's very little time to focus on the various engineering challenges in any depth. Hammond has a good track record in formats that balance science and entertainment, but this one constantly misses the mark on both of those elements: Dr Shini Somara provides cursory VTs on the required elements, but would have been better deployed in the studio where she could have picked up on all the technical matters arising, and then the finale is critically undermined by choppy editing. To show off a chain reaction machine properly, the camerawork needs to be as well choreographed as the machine itself, capturing the whole thing in a single flowing shot if at all possible. 48 edits in 70 seconds (as we saw in the first episode) really won't cut it - or rather it ''will'' cut it, to ribbons, robbing us and the teams of the big "wow" moment at the end. All a bit of a shame, because this could have been a fun twist on the build-a-machine genre, if only the contestants' ingenuity had been matched on the production side.
 +
 
 +
== Champions ==
 +
 
 +
Fieldhouse Brothers (Adam, Damian and Robin Fieldhouse).
 +
 
 +
== Key moments ==
 +
 
 +
Lack of confidence in your central conceit ahoy: Hammond asked the contestants to carry out a task without making him move, yet gave the teams up to three interventions. Eh? To be clear, apart from the initial trigger, teams aren't allowed to design human interaction into their machines - the permitted interventions are just a measure to avoid a machine being a damp squib because it fails early, and they (apparently) count against the team.
== Trivia ==
== Trivia ==
Line 28: Line 36:
Officially billed as ''Richard Hammond's Crazy Contraptions''.
Officially billed as ''Richard Hammond's Crazy Contraptions''.
-
The heats aired at 8pm on Fridays, with subsequent episodes shunted off at 10:55 on Sunday. Possibly the viewers were put off by Hammond flaunting wealth in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis.
+
The heats aired at 8pm on Fridays, with subsequent episodes shunted off at 10:55pm the Sunday before (i.e. with just over 50 hours separating episodes 4 and 5). Possibly the skits supposedly showing Hammond supposedly flaunting his wealth fell a bit flat in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis. But even if that hadn't been going on, the show was more than capable of failing on its own demerits: in the entire run we saw only one professional review of the show (by Benji Wilson in The Telegraph) and the headline was "Richard Hammond’s Crazy Contraptions tries to take on YouTube (and fails)". Considering that every week Hammond's opening spiel told us that chain reaction machines were "made famous by viral videos", you'd have to say they brought that on themselves.
 +
 
 +
Even if you did stick with the show on catchup, All4 managed to spoil the result anyway by having the final represented by an image of... the winners holding their trophy. D'oh.
== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 41: Line 51:
[[Category:Technological]]
[[Category:Technological]]
[[Category:Optomen Productions]]
[[Category:Optomen Productions]]
-
[[Category:Current]]
 

Revision as of 12:28, 7 June 2022

Contents

Host

Richard Hammond

Co-hosts

Judge: Zach Umperovitch

Insert presenter: Shini Somara

Broadcast

Optomen for Channel 4, 29 April to 5 June 2022 (7 episodes in 1 series)

Synopsis

A sort of inversion of The Great Egg Race. Teams compete to create "chain reaction machines" to carry out a simple task in the most complicated way, for example stopping Hammond from having to get out of his bath to feed his dog at the other end of his mansion. In one section they have to demonstrate a particular scientific principle and in another they need to incorporate a particular object. Knockout series structure.

Part of a machine built by team "Social Mediocrity" to flip a switch on the kettle at the right of the screen.

Unfortunately, with so many moving parts (and on this occasion that's not a metaphor), there's very little time to focus on the various engineering challenges in any depth. Hammond has a good track record in formats that balance science and entertainment, but this one constantly misses the mark on both of those elements: Dr Shini Somara provides cursory VTs on the required elements, but would have been better deployed in the studio where she could have picked up on all the technical matters arising, and then the finale is critically undermined by choppy editing. To show off a chain reaction machine properly, the camerawork needs to be as well choreographed as the machine itself, capturing the whole thing in a single flowing shot if at all possible. 48 edits in 70 seconds (as we saw in the first episode) really won't cut it - or rather it will cut it, to ribbons, robbing us and the teams of the big "wow" moment at the end. All a bit of a shame, because this could have been a fun twist on the build-a-machine genre, if only the contestants' ingenuity had been matched on the production side.

Champions

Fieldhouse Brothers (Adam, Damian and Robin Fieldhouse).

Key moments

Lack of confidence in your central conceit ahoy: Hammond asked the contestants to carry out a task without making him move, yet gave the teams up to three interventions. Eh? To be clear, apart from the initial trigger, teams aren't allowed to design human interaction into their machines - the permitted interventions are just a measure to avoid a machine being a damp squib because it fails early, and they (apparently) count against the team.

Trivia

Officially billed as Richard Hammond's Crazy Contraptions.

The heats aired at 8pm on Fridays, with subsequent episodes shunted off at 10:55pm the Sunday before (i.e. with just over 50 hours separating episodes 4 and 5). Possibly the skits supposedly showing Hammond supposedly flaunting his wealth fell a bit flat in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis. But even if that hadn't been going on, the show was more than capable of failing on its own demerits: in the entire run we saw only one professional review of the show (by Benji Wilson in The Telegraph) and the headline was "Richard Hammond’s Crazy Contraptions tries to take on YouTube (and fails)". Considering that every week Hammond's opening spiel told us that chain reaction machines were "made famous by viral videos", you'd have to say they brought that on themselves.

Even if you did stick with the show on catchup, All4 managed to spoil the result anyway by having the final represented by an image of... the winners holding their trophy. D'oh.

See also

Simply Complicated

Pictures

They had the "social distancing" thing sorted, though.

Feedback

To correct something on this page or post an addition, please complete this form and press "Send":
If you are asking us a question, please read our contact us page and FAQ first.

Name: E-mail:   
A Labyrinth Games site.
Design by Thomas.
Printable version
Editors: Log in